# Deep-tier financing: realistic path or empty promise?

> Explore how Deep Tier Financing helps MSMEs get affordable credit by linking suppliers to anchor buyers, while addressing tech, cost, and adoption challenges.

URL: https://www.venzotechnologies.com/blog/deep-tier-financing-was-meant-to-prevent-that-but-has-it-delivered
Author: Balaji, Co-Founder, Venzo Technologies
Published: 2025-11-10
Topic: Supply chain finance

> *“When a Tier-2 supplier runs out of working capital, the whole production line slows down.   

 
> Deep Tier Financing was meant to prevent that — but has it delivered?”*
 

## The Persistent Credit Gap

 
 The **Asian Development Bank (ADB)** estimates the global trade-finance gap at **$2.5 trillion** in 2022, up from $1.7 trillion in 2020.   

 
 Almost **half of MSME trade-finance requests** are rejected, compared with just **7 % for large corporates**.   
 
 Modern supply chains stretch across **dozens of countries and hundreds of suppliers**.   
 When finance stops at Tier 1, liquidity bottlenecks cascade through every layer of production.   
 
 That is the context in which **Deep Tier Financing (DTF)** emerged — to push affordable liquidity further upstream. 
 
 --- 
 

## The Concept: Extending the Credit Cascade

 
 Traditional **Supply Chain Finance (SCF)** stops at direct suppliers.   
 **Deep Tier Financing** extends that model to Tier 2 and Tier 3 vendors so that they can access early-payment finance priced on the **anchor buyer’s credit**, not their own.   
 
 In theory, this lowers MSME borrowing costs, stabilises supply chains, and enhances inclusivity.   
 In practice, scaling this model has proven far harder than expected. 
 
 --- 
 

## Why It Hasn’t Scaled Yet

 
 1. **Traceability gap** – Financiers need proof that a Tier-2 invoice truly relates to the anchor’s purchase order. Without that digital link, the risk shifts back to the MSME.   
 2. **Limited data visibility** – Most anchors’ ERP and procurement systems end at Tier 1.   
 3. **Onboarding costs** – Extending KYC/AML checks to thousands of sub-suppliers is economically prohibitive.   
 4. **Weak incentives** – Unless anchors perceive a tangible benefit (resilience, ESG metrics, price stability), deep-tier inclusion remains a low priority.   
 
 --- 
 

## How Platforms Have Tried to Solve It

 
 ### 1️⃣ Tokenised Payables (e-Vouchers / DPOs) 
 Anchor-approved invoices are converted into **digital tokens** that can be split and transferred upstream.   
 Each token carries the anchor ID, PO reference, amount, due date, and an immutable audit trail.   
 Every transfer remains cryptographically tied to the original anchor obligation.   
 *Model used in Standard Chartered × Linklogis “WeQChain” and newer “SCeChain”.*   
 
 ### 2️⃣ Permissioned Transfers 
 Smart-contract logic ensures tokens move only to **KYC-verified, whitelisted** suppliers, within defined tier limits and approval rules. 
 
 ### 3️⃣ Data-Matching Alternative 
 Some platforms avoid tokenisation altogether.   
 DBS Bank’s **Rong-E Lian** platform finances Tier-2 invoices only when **PO / logistics / goods-receipt data** align with anchor orders — ensuring linkage without tokens. 
 
 ### 4️⃣ Shared Visibility via DLT 
 Distributed-ledger frameworks record all transactions on a shared, tamper-proof network visible to anchors, financiers, and suppliers. 
 
 --- 
 

## What the Evidence Shows (2023 – 2025)

 
 | Platform / Bank | Core Technology | Current Status & Findings | Interpretation | 
 |------------------|-----------------|---------------------------|----------------| 
 | **Standard Chartered × Linklogis (China)** | Blockchain / DLT + e-Vouchers | Linklogis reports **RMB 411 B** cumulative volume (2024) and **330 k SMEs served**; partnership continues via **SCeChain**, **Olea**, and BIS digital-trade-token pilot. | **Active** ecosystem; selective public case updates but ongoing development. | 
 | **DBS – Rong-E Lian (China Logistics)** | Blockchain + Data Matching | Launched 2019 for > 1 000 suppliers; few public updates since 2020. | Likely remained **pilot-scale**; limited recent visibility. | 
 | **Marco Polo Network (R3 Corda)** | DLT (Corda) + Digital Payment Obligations | Entered **insolvency 2023** after funding shortfall despite broad bank participation. | Demonstrates **high cost / low-volume challenge** of DLT trade networks. | 
 | **PrimaTrade (EU)** | API / PO-Invoice Data Chaining (IPU Model) | **Active 2025**; offering both IPU and *non-IPU* deep-tier models to ease buyer disclosure & accelerate scale. | **Operational**, focusing on document validation rather than blockchain. | 
 | **CredAble (India)** | Cloud / API Workflow | **Active**; markets deep-tier modules for banks & NBFCs; data-driven, non-DLT. | **Pragmatic and sustainable**, using workflow automation instead of tokens. | 
 
 --- 
 

## The Economics Problem: Cost vs. Scale

 
 DLT / tokenisation brings transparency but also heavy infrastructure costs: 
 
 - **Fixed technology costs** — enterprise blockchain nodes, security, audits, and 24×7 operations.   
 - **Integration friction** — lengthy IT and legal reviews for each participant.   
 - **Low transaction margins** — SCF yields are thin; deep-tier volumes haven’t yet offset platform burn.   
 
 Several DLT-based networks (e.g., **Marco Polo**, **Contour**) shut down in 2023 citing **unsustainable operating costs** and **insufficient transaction flow**.   
 DLT remains technically sound but commercially fragile without critical mass and anchor adoption. 
 
 --- 
 

## Legal and Market Readiness

 
 - **12 jurisdictions** now align with **UNCITRAL MLETR**, granting digital negotiable instruments legal status (UK, Singapore, France, UAE, Mauritius etc.).   
 - **LEI-based entity IDs** and **shared KYC utilities** are reducing onboarding friction.   
 - **Anchors are digitising procurement data**, creating the visibility rails DTF needs.   
 
 These advances set the stage for the next phase — but haven’t yet solved the adoption gap. 
 
 --- 
 

## The Realistic Verdict

 
 **Today:** Deep Tier Financing is *not* closing the MSME credit gap at scale.   
 It works in **controlled, data-rich ecosystems** — usually a single anchor in a single jurisdiction — but not as a universal model. 
 
 **Why:** Traceability, onboarding cost, and **DLT economics** remain limiting factors.   
 Anchors’ commercial incentives and data-sharing readiness are still weak.   
 
 **Tomorrow:** As **digital-trade laws**, **interoperable data**, and **shared KYC** mature, DTF could evolve into a viable mainstream mechanism for extending liquidity beyond Tier 1.   
 
 --- 
 

## Venzo Perspective

 
 Deep Tier Financing is less a product than a **blueprint** for how financial trust may work in the next decade.   
 It replaces collateral with **verified data** and manual assurance with **transparent governance**. 
 
 For it to realise its potential, three foundations must align: 
 
 1. **Digital traceability** — every financed claim must link to an anchor-approved obligation.   
 2. **Interoperability** — open data standards must connect anchors, banks, and fintechs.   
 3. **Governance** — permissioned, auditable systems must replace paper-based verification.   
 
 Until those converge, DTF remains a **promising architecture in search of an economic model**.   
 
> *When credit follows verified data, inclusion moves from intention to infrastructure.* 
 
 ---